2026年6月12日、ワシントンD.C.
UFCの「最大のショー」の舞台
2026年6月12日、ワシントンD.C.
法的対立と公的批判
しかし、連邦裁判所は、このイベントの開催を許可した。この決定は、イベントの合法性を示すものとなった。
ファンの声と期待
「このイベントは、米国の歴史的な象徴であるリンカーン記念碑で行われた」と、トレーシー・フィルバック氏は述べた。「これは、トーディー・ローズベルト氏の時代にさかのぼる伝統である」と彼は語った。
今後の展開と影響
The highly anticipated UFC event, scheduled to take place at the nation's capital, has sparked intense debate among fans and lawmakers, with the outcome remaining uncertain.
The UFC’s 2026 “Fight Night” at the Lincoln Memorial marks a historic first for the organization, which has never hosted a major event at a site designated as a National Historic Landmark. The venue, a 99-acre complex housing the Lincoln Memorial, the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, and the World War II Memorial, is managed by the National Park Service (NPS). The NPS typically restricts commercial events at such sites to preserve their cultural and historical integrity, making the UFC’s approval a highly unusual occurrence. According to a 2023 NPS policy review, only three commercial events have been permitted at the Lincoln Memorial since 1990, all related to presidential anniversaries or national commemorations.
The legal challenge against the event originated from the “Preservation Alliance for Washington, D.C.,” a nonprofit group focused on protecting historic sites. The group argued that the UFC’s use of the memorial’s Reflecting Pool area for a temporary stage and crowd control infrastructure violated the 1966 National Historic Preservation Act. “The Lincoln Memorial is not a concert venue or a combat sports arena,” said Alliance spokesperson Rachel Monroe in a May 2026 press release. “This event risks damaging the site’s architectural and cultural significance.” The lawsuit sought to block the event until the UFC could provide a revised plan that adhered to preservation guidelines.
The federal court’s decision to allow the event was based on the UFC’s compliance with several NPS requirements. These included limiting the event’s footprint to 10% of the Reflecting Pool’s surface area, using temporary, non-invasive structures, and ensuring that all construction materials were removed within 48 hours. Additionally, the UFC agreed to donate $500,000 to the NPS’s Historic Preservation Fund, a sum that exceeded the typical fee for such permits. “The court recognized the UFC’s commitment to balancing entertainment with preservation,” said Judge Margaret Langford in her June 2026 ruling. “This is a rare but not unprecedented exception to the NPS’s usual policies.”
Fan reactions to the event have been divided, reflecting broader societal debates about the commercialization of historic spaces. Social media platforms have seen heated discussions, with some users praising the UFC for “bringing excitement to a national landmark” and others criticizing it as “trivializing history.” Tracy Furbay,
Find more reporting in our スポーツ section.